District Court Cases in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 112,089
BAKER v. ASHONG et al
as 1:2024cv00820
Plaintiff:
LINDSEY DIANE BAKER
Defendant:
HELENA ASHONG, HOPE DE KREF, KATHY NICHOLAS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICHARDSON v. USA
as 1:2024cv00828
Petitioner:
DAQUWON RICHARDSON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
SHEET METAL WORKERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND v. FALCON METAL FABRICATION, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv00816
Plaintiff:
SHEET METAL WORKERS NATIONAL PENSION FUND
Defendant:
FALCON METAL FABRICATION, INC. and JERRY LEE ROBERTSON, II
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1381 E.R.I.S.A.
Holm v. Galipeau et al
as 3:2024cv00384
Plaintiff:
Austin Jeremiah Holm
Defendant:
J Galipeau and Bridegroom
Not Yet Classified:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DALE et al v. CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
as 1:2024cv00818
Plaintiff:
KEYON DALE and LAMONTAY AYERS
Defendant:
CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00817
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BRENTON v. QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
as 3:2024cv00080
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MICHAEL BRENTON
Defendant:
QUALITY CORRECTIONAL CARE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glassel v. Neal et al
as 3:2024cv00387
Plaintiff:
Christopher J Glassel
Defendant:
Ron Neal, Raccio and Sherri Fritter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Yoder v. DeGuilio et al
as 3:2024cv00378
Plaintiff:
Philip J Yoder
Defendant:
Jon E DeGuilio, John M Maciejczyk, Miguel Oviedo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN v. DIVISION OF INDIANA
as 3:2024cv00380
Petitioner:
James Michael Brown
Respondent:
Division Of Indiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
