Indiana Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 30,394
MCMULLIN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
SHAWN MCMULLIN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Larry v. USA
as 1:2024cv00196
Petitioner:
Torrence Larry
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
HOPKINS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00824
Petitioner:
ANTOINE HOPKINS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
CALLANTINE v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00183
Petitioner:
ZACHARY W. CALLANTINE
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL, DENNIS REGGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00388
Petitioner:
Taurus Butler
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00182
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MIDDLETON v. DAVID et al
as 1:2024cv00825
Plaintiff:
JASON MIDDLETON
Defendant:
DAVID and MORGAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Hershberger et al
as 1:2024cv00194
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Ray Hogan
Defendant:
Sherrif Hershberger and Pgs - 1 to 9 Names of Staff Involved
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lake v. State of Indiana et al
as 2:2024cv00168
Plaintiff:
Logan Bradley Lake
Defendant:
Indiana State of, Benjamin Lopez, Richard D Rivera and others
Not Yet Classified:
Service List
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
