District Court Cases in Georgia
Cases 11 - 20 of 163,403
Adams v. Willey et al
as 1:2024cv02149
Plaintiff:
Segundo Adams
Defendant:
James O. Willey, F. L. Moore & Sons, Inc. and National Interstate Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02150
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams-Clark v. McClelland et al
as 2:2024cv00109
Plaintiff:
Adam Y. Williams-Clark
Defendant:
Chief Judge Troy Russell McClelland and City of Cumming, Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Xtreme Heaters, Inc.
as 1:2024cv02151
Plaintiff:
Cate Brown
Defendant:
Xtreme Heaters, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
Brashear v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv02146
Plaintiff:
John Henry Brashear
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWW)
Regions Bank v. Roth
as 2:2024mi00002
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Steven A. Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Regions Bank v. Roth
as 2:2024mi00001
Plaintiff:
Regions Bank
Defendant:
Steven A. Roth
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1963 Registration of judgment from another district
Brinson v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Raheem T. Brinson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
WOODS v. WIZA
as 4:2024cv00071
Petitioner:
FABIAN WOODS, JR
Respondent:
Warden SCOTT WIZA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
