US District Court for the Southern District of Georgia
Cases 1 - 10 of 21,655
Davis v. West et al
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Louis Davis
Defendant:
Warden Mr. West and Brinden Murry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ward et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William R. Jackson
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jamonte Brinkley
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Andrew Mcfarlane, Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinson v. Warden, FCI Jesup
as 2:2024cv00068
Petitioner:
Raheem T. Brinson
Respondent:
Warden, FCI Jesup
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Gray v. U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
as 4:2024cv00093
Plaintiff:
David B. Gray
Defendant:
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ussery v. State of GA et al
as 1:2024cv00070
Petitioner:
Roger Ussery
Respondent:
State of GA, Georgia State Prison and R. U. Jackson
Not Yet Classified:
Attorney General State of Georgia (Notice Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owners Insurance Company v. Mobile Drug Screening LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Owners Insurance Company
Defendant:
Mobile Drug Screening LLC and Timothy Mackey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Nicholson v. Continental Casualty Company
as 1:2024cv00068
Plaintiff:
Chris G. Nicholson
Defendant:
Continental Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Nichols v. Walmart Inc et al
as 1:2024cv00069
Plaintiff:
Doretha Nichols
Defendant:
Walmart Inc and Walmart Claim Services, Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
