Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 810,234
Smith v. Kemper Insurance et al
as 1:2024cv00587
Plaintiff:
Candace Smith
Defendant:
Kemper Insurance, Steve D'Ambrosio, Allstate Insurance and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
McBride et al v. Hawkins
as 2:2024cv01394
Plaintiff:
Sean McBride and G Shellye Horowitz
Defendant:
Randy Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01278
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12181 Title III Americans with Disabilities Act
Wade v. City of Lake Oswego et al
as 3:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Nicole Wade
Defendant:
City of Lake Oswego, Michael Svoboda and George Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
DAVIS v. MONROE et al
as 7:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
SHELAINE V DAVIS
Defendant:
JUDGE MATT MONROE, JUSTO CABRAL, VALDOSTA POLICE DEPARTMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Davis v. American Senior Communities, LLC
as 1:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Joshua Davis
Defendant:
American Senior Communities, LLC
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 7703 Discrimination - Review of Agency Act
Taebel v. NFL
as 3:2024cv00390
Plaintiff:
Mitch Taebel
Defendant:
NFL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00198
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
Thibodeaux v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv00388
Plaintiff:
Cody Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Louisiana Department of Public Safety and Corrections, Randy Lavespere and Jonathan Emery
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
