Cases 31 - 40 of 46,567
Lemons v. Carr et al
as 2:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Iema D Lemons
Defendant:
Kevin A Carr, Jared Hoy, Randall Hepp and others
Other:
Tyshun Lemons
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Gonzales v. Swanson
as 1:2024cv00693
Plaintiff:
Antonio B Gonzales
Defendant:
Mark Swanson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jozefyk v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00697
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Jozefyk
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Davenport, Fred v. Steingraeber, Brooke et al
as 3:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Fred Lee Davenport
Defendant:
Brooke Steingraeber, Kyle Ferstl, Jane Doe 1 and others
Not Yet Classified:
CCI Prison Facility
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reese v. Sturm
as 2:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reese
Defendant:
Nancy Sturm
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Reese v. Goulee et al
as 2:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reese
Defendant:
Michael D Goulee, Jorge Gomez, Craig Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Annamalai, Annamalai v. Emmerich, Warden
as 3:2024cv00367
Petitioner:
Annamalai Annamalai
Respondent:
Warden Emmerich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lewis, Daniel v. Stafford, Bridgette et al
as 3:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
Daniel F.W. Lewis
Defendant:
Bridgette L. Stafford, Rey R. Palop, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
