Cases 31 - 40 of 1,188,280
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BROWNING v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2024cv00281
Plaintiff:
STEVEN BROWNING
Defendant:
ADAMS and WALK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GREENWELL v. BEATTY et al
as 1:2024cv00948
Plaintiff:
REGINALD A. GREENWELL, JR.
Defendant:
BEATTY and AWOLUSI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC et al
as 5:2024cv03089
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
Vital Core Health Strategies, LLC, J. Ehrlich, Calvin Hayden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Younger et al v. Zmuda et al
as 5:2024cv03091
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Younger, Barbara Frantz, Kora L. Liles and others
Defendant:
Jeff Zmuda, Donna Hook and Aramark Food Service
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. USA
as 5:2024cv00147
Petitioner:
Lamonte H. Brown
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Stickney v. Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
as 5:2024cv00148
Petitioner:
Brian Thomas Stickney
Respondent:
Warden David Paul of Federal Medical Center Lexington
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Goods v. Daley et al
as 2:2024cv00096
Plaintiff:
Terrill Goods, Sr.
Defendant:
James A. Daley, Turner, Officer Hunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clayton, III v. Woosley
as 4:2024cv00055
Petitioner:
Earl Clayton, III
Respondent:
Jason Woosley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Frederick v. Henderson County et al
as 4:2024cv00056
Plaintiff:
Gerald Wayne Frederick, Jr.
Defendant:
Henderson County, Zachery Ortis and Austin Miller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
