Oregon Civil Rights Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 3,330
Panabaker et al v. Hood River
as 3:2024cv00901
Plaintiff:
Ruston Panabaker, Sheri Panabaker, John J Hutson and others
Defendant:
City of Hood River
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hamilton v. Tigard Police Department
as 3:2024cv00895
Plaintiff:
Jefferson Hamilton
Defendant:
Tigard Police Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Vance v. Squiglin et al
as 6:2024cv00872
Plaintiff:
Joseph D Vance
Defendant:
Diana Squiglin, James Statzman, Richard Statzman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lofall v. County of Clackamas et al
as 3:2024cv00838
Plaintiff:
Tyler Allen Lofall
Defendant:
County of Clackamas, Clackamas County Sheriff's Department, Clackamas County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Moore v. Irish et al
as 1:2024cv00844
Plaintiff:
Daren J. Moore
Defendant:
Patrick Irish, Thomas Andreazzi, Robert Fenner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Craig v. Clackamas County et al
as 3:2024cv00832
Plaintiff:
Travis Barrett Craig
Defendant:
Clackamas County, James Williams, Jordan Woodward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Conway
as 2:2024cv00815
Plaintiff:
Shane Anthony Lews
Defendant:
Ashley Conway
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wade v. City of Lake Oswego et al
as 3:2024cv00813
Plaintiff:
Nicole Wade
Defendant:
City of Lake Oswego, Michael Svoboda and George Burke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Schlotzhauer v. Department of Justice
as 6:2024cv00805
Plaintiff:
Rick Roy Schlotzhauer
Defendant:
Department of Justice
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Turner v. United States Patent and Trademark Office et al
as 3:2024cv00795
Plaintiff:
Terrance Turner
Defendant:
United States Patent and Trademark Office and Trademark Pioneer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
