Nevada Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 834
Gando v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01053
Plaintiff:
Fatin Sawa Gando
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Magdalera v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01052
Plaintiff:
Andrea L Magdalera
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bratcher v. Social Security Administration
as 2:2024cv01031
Plaintiff:
Samantha Ann Bratcher
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Jamerson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01020
Plaintiff:
Scott Dylan Jamerson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Morales-Sandoval v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01013
Plaintiff:
David Morales-Sandoval
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Hamilton v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv01007
Plaintiff:
Roger Ambrose Hamilton
Defendant:
Commissioner of SS Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Rogers v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00893
Plaintiff:
Denise Rogers
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Johnson v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Christina Lousie Johnson
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley and SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elliott v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00819
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Elliott v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00199
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Elliott, Jr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
