Illinois Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10,159
Schaefer v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04030
Plaintiff:
Josette Schaefer
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Trotter v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv04025
Plaintiff:
Marcus A. Trotter
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Joseph v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03963
Plaintiff:
Augustine Joseph
Defendant:
Commissioner Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Graminski v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 3:2024cv01277
Plaintiff:
David Graminski
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Yarrow v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03968
Plaintiff:
Jacob A. Yarrow
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Castro v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03964
Plaintiff:
Susana Castro
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Bonner v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03960
Plaintiff:
Vernon Bonner
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Tate v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv03922
Plaintiff:
Carl Lee Tate
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Smith v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv03118
Plaintiff:
Crystal Smith
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security - Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Drinkwater v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv03848
Plaintiff:
Mary Drinkwater
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
