Sixth Circuit Civil Rights Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 71,085
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11472
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 Americans with Disabilities Act
Webb v. Republican Party of Cumberland County TN
as 2:2024cv00039
Plaintiff:
Gregory Ryan Webb
Defendant:
Republican Party of Cumberland County TN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Shanna Glynn v. Marquette City Police Department, et al
as 24-1486
Plaintiff:
SHANNA M. GLYNN
Defendant:
MARQUETTE CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and STATE OF MICHIGAN
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3471
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Filauro v. Rausch
as 3:2024cv00677
Plaintiff:
Richard Danial Filauro
Defendant:
David Rausch
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnson v. 1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company et al
as 3:2024cv00687
Plaintiff:
Robert W. Johnson
Defendant:
1011778 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, 1019334 B.C. Unlimited Liability Company, Burger King Canada Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02367
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv11450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Beck et al v. Montcalm, County of et al
as 1:2024cv00575
Plaintiff:
JoAnn Beck, Patrick Beck, Serrina Bowser and others
Defendant:
Montcalm, County of and Joanne Vukin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
