Fifth Circuit Cases
Cases 61 - 70 of 840,126
Burton v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00211
Petitioner:
Joshua Mazique Burton
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gibbs, Jr. v. Director TDCJ
as 1:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
Levi Gibbs, Jr.
Respondent:
Director TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zarate v. Coger et al
as 5:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
Isaac Zarate
Defendant:
Warden FNU Coger, Warden FNU Gould, Warden FNU Feazel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC v. Dish Network Corporation
as 2:2024cv00420
Plaintiff:
Quantum Technology Innovations, LLC
Defendant:
Dish Network Corporation
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sensor360 LLC v. Alps Electric Co., Ltd.
as 2:2024cv00424
Plaintiff:
Sensor360 LLC
Defendant:
Alps Electric Co., Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sensor360 LLC v. Ficosa International S.A.
as 2:2024cv00421
Plaintiff:
Sensor360 LLC
Defendant:
Ficosa International S.A.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Patent Armory Inc. v. Merk KGaA
as 2:2024cv00419
Plaintiff:
Patent Armory Inc.
Defendant:
Merk KGaA
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Sensor360 LLC v. ASUStek Computer Inc.
as 2:2024cv00422
Plaintiff:
Sensor360 LLC
Defendant:
ASUStek Computer Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
American Incentive Advisors, LLC v. McCormick Motors, Inc.
as 1:2024cv00619
Plaintiff:
American Incentive Advisors, LLC
Defendant:
McCormick Motors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
