Cases 1 - 10 of 1,185,512
Davis v. West et al
as 6:2024cv00024
Plaintiff:
Louis Davis
Defendant:
Warden Mr. West and Brinden Murry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Ward et al
as 3:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
William R. Jackson
Defendant:
Timothy C. Ward, Kim Patton-Johnson and Stephanie Damiels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brinkley v. Oliver et al
as 3:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jamonte Brinkley
Defendant:
Tyrone Oliver, Andrew Mcfarlane, Veronica Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MCMULLIN v. WARDEN
as 2:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
SHAWN MCMULLIN
Respondent:
WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00826
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BLUE v. INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2024cv00181
Plaintiff:
JEREMY BLUE
Defendant:
INDIANA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, FRANK VANIHEL, DENNIS REGGLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Haynes v. Quinn et al
as 5:2024cv00125
Defendant:
FNU Starowicz, FNU Quinn, FNU Lay and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jeremy Haynes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowles v. Dauzat
as 5:2024cv00652
Plaintiff:
Desi Lamont Dowles, Jr
Defendant:
Michele Dauzat
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robertson v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00275
Petitioner:
Kenneth Rashaad Robertson
Respondent:
Edward O. Pearson United States of America
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hollon v. State of Mississippi
as 1:2024cv00148
Plaintiff:
Joshua David Hollon
Defendant:
State of Mississippi
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
