Cases 1 - 10 of 76,927
Deafueh Monbo v. Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., et al
as 24-7074
Plaintiff:
Deafueh Monbo
Defendant:
Richmond American Homes of Maryland, Inc., Creigh Northrop Team, PC, doing business as Northrop Realty, Gail Poole-Vaugh and others
v. TRUMP et al
as 1:2024cv01435
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Not Yet Classified:
DONALD J. TRUMP, U.S. Senate Impeachment Comm. and B.W.T., a minor child
MAJORS v. MCDONOUGH
as 1:2024cv01433
Plaintiff:
DARRYL MAJORS
Defendant:
DENIS MCDONOUGH
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
DALBIS v. PUBIC EMPLOYEES OF SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICES OF FRANCE AND EUROPE
as 1:2024cv01434
Plaintiff:
LOUIS-ALEXANDRE NOEL ALBERT DALBIS
Defendant:
PUBIC EMPLOYEES OF SECURITY AND INTELLIGENCE SERVICES OF FRANCE AND EUROPE, NATIONAL GENDARMERIE and LAURANT MAUVE-CECILE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
STRIPLIN v. WRAY et al
as 1:2024cv01437
Plaintiff:
AAREN WILLIAMS STRIPLIN
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER A. WRAY, KAMALA D. HARRIS, LLOYD J. AUSTIN, III and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01443
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01445
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01432
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1401 Education: Handicapped Child Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01447
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
