District Court Cases in Washington
Cases 11 - 20 of 80,787
Armstrong v. Commissioner of
as 2:2024cv00691
Plaintiff:
Amanda Wray Hope Armstrong
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner of
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Vargas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05379
Plaintiff:
Smitty G Vargas
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Biekert v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00684
Plaintiff:
Madeline Biekert
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Leighty v. Spokane County et al
as 2:2024cv00165
Plaintiff:
James Leighty
Defendant:
Spokane County, Sheriff John Nowels and Spokane County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
COENMANS v. IMBREHECHTS et al
as 2:2024cv00678
Plaintiff:
FRANK COENMANS
Defendant:
LUC IMBREHECHTS and BAKON BAKKERIJ MACHINES, USA INCORPORATED
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
A.A. et al v. Secret Harbor
as 2:2024cv00681
Plaintiff:
A.A., M.T. and J.Y.
Defendant:
Secret Harbor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00682
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Gott v. AscendTek, LLC
as 2:2024cv00680
Plaintiff:
Anthony Gott
Defendant:
AscendTek, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Nickson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Rachel Nickson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Young v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2024cv05377
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Young
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
