District Court Cases in Ohio
Cases 21 - 30 of 166,712
Alexander v. Davis et al
as 1:2024cv00285
Plaintiff:
Jerone Alexander
Defendant:
Cynthia D Davis, Charles O'Connor, N. Brabson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. City of Middletown Police Department et al
as 1:2024cv00286
Plaintiff:
Christopher Robinson
Defendant:
City of Middletown Police Department, John Doe and John Roe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thompson v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02510
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Thompson
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Maietta v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02541
Plaintiff:
Phillip Maietta
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Polk v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02501
Plaintiff:
Justin Polk
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Lambert v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02536
Plaintiff:
James Lambert, Sr.
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Sapp v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02504
Plaintiff:
Herman Mack Sapp
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Neal v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02499
Plaintiff:
Rosemary Neal
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Wardean v. Davol, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02514
Plaintiff:
Mark Wardean
Defendant:
Davol, Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Savoy v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv02538
Plaintiff:
Timothy Savoy
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
