US District Court for the Northern District of New York
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,389
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00671
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hendricks v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Terrie Lee Hendricks
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Abbott Hook v. O'Malley
as 5:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Ian J. Abbott Hook
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Homles v. Shabirr et al
as 9:2024cv00660
Plaintiff:
Jalen Homles and Jalen Holmes
Defendant:
A. Shabirr, J. Huntington, J. Folwer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Collins v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00663
Plaintiff:
Heather Collins
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
O'Brien v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 5:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Kaliegh O'Brien
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Jones v. Wolcott
as 9:2024cv00661
Petitioner:
Vandon Jones
Respondent:
Julie Wolcott
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Delacruz v. Ricci et al
as 9:2024cv00664
Plaintiff:
Kelvin Delacruz
Defendant:
C.O. Brendan Ricci, C.O. Todd Shoemaker, C.O. Dustin Vanhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Viacom International Inc. v. Bulman et al
as 5:2024cv00665
Plaintiff:
Viacom International Inc.
Defendant:
Thomas Bulman, Thom Bulman LLC and Bull Airs NY LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
