District Court Cases in Missouri
Cases 31 - 40 of 95,475
Cory v. Hernandez
as 4:2024cv00675
Plaintiff:
Kelly Cory
Defendant:
Yaiser Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Peet et al v. City of Sikeston, Missouri et al
as 1:2024cv00094
Plaintiff:
Gregory Allen Peet, Sr. and Audrea Rachelle Peet
Defendant:
City of Sikeston, Missouri, Greg Turnbow, Jonathan Douglass and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Spann v. Stange
as 1:2024cv00095
Petitioner:
Jihad Ahmad Spann
Respondent:
Bill Stange
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Husic v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00672
Plaintiff:
Zineta Husic
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
SSA Office of General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Osmanovic v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 4:2024cv00679
Plaintiff:
Merima Osmanovic
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00345
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00346
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Negron v. Ascension Health
as 4:2024cv00669
Plaintiff:
Angel J. Negron
Defendant:
Ascension Health
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00668
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Keysor et al v. Uncle Julio's Corporation et al
as 4:2024cv00670
Plaintiff:
Audrey Keysor, Cyle Quick and Liv Wysocki
Defendant:
Uncle Julio's Corporation and The Mexican Restaurant, Inc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
