Massachusetts Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,407
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv11300
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
IN RE: JONATHAN DONNELL WILLIAMS
as 1:2024cv11274
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Donnell Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Beatty v. Kennedy
as 1:2024cv11284
Petitioner:
Joseph W Beatty
Respondent:
Stephen Kennedy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Latham v. Officer Wyatt et al
as 1:2024cv11310
Plaintiff:
Lincoln Latham
Defendant:
Officer Wyatt and Inmate Canteen Office at Old Colony Correctional Center
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv11254
Petitioner:
Vitaly Borker
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Miles v. Bowers
as 1:2024cv11243
Petitioner:
Arthur Miles
Respondent:
Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lettieri v. Vilardo
as 1:2024cv11230
Petitioner:
David Carmine Lettieri
Respondent:
Lawrence Joseph Vilardo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Samia v. Divris
as 4:2024cv40070
Petitioner:
Elias A. Samia
Respondent:
Matthew Divris
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Macdonald v. Andrus et al
as 1:2024cv11199
Plaintiff:
Kinley Macdonald
Defendant:
Justin Andrus, Circuit Judge David J. Barron, Clerk, USCA Chanda J Beita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zella v. USA DO NOT DOCKET IN THIS CASE ALL ENTRIES ARE TO BE MADE IN CRIMINAL CASE 22cr40021
as 4:2024cv40069
Petitioner:
Zachary Zella
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
