Maryland Social Security Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 5,758
Cockey v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv01446
Plaintiff:
Dean Cockey
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Gwizdowski v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01431
Plaintiff:
Jill M. Gwizdowski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Waters v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv01435
Plaintiff:
Leslie Waters
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Fletcher v. O' Malley
as 8:2024cv01322
Plaintiff:
Shamael Te Fletcher
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Durrant v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01312
Plaintiff:
Audlica Durrant
Defendant:
Mayor Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Farmer v. Commissioner, Social Security
as 1:2024cv01253
Plaintiff:
Mary C Farmer
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Francis v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01218
Plaintiff:
Jesse James Francis
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bell v. O' Malley
as 8:2024cv01210
Plaintiff:
Tina Bell
Defendant:
Martin O' Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sailor v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 8:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Crystal Sailor
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Wilson v. O'Malley
as 8:2024cv01152
Plaintiff:
Melvin Wilson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
