Contract Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 6,889
Yu v. Presnell et al
as 2:2024cv04111
Plaintiff:
Heidi Yu Ling Yu
Defendant:
Peter Presnell, Michelle Presnell, Ashley Presnell and others
Cross Defendant:
Qingchuan Tan
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Himmelberger v. Kiani et al
as 3:2024cv00868
Plaintiff:
Dianne Himmelberger
Defendant:
Joe Kiani, Micah Young, Bilal Muhsin and others
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0151 Federal Communications Act of 1934
Natbony v. Gabriel Resources, Ltd. et al
as 9:2024cv80630
Plaintiff:
William Natbony
Defendant:
Gabriel Resources, Ltd., Dragos Tanase, Richard Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Russell v. Richison et al
as 5:2024cv00502
Plaintiff:
Ryan Russell
Defendant:
Chad Richison, Chris Thomas, Craig E. Boelte and others
Kelley v. Boneparth et al
as 2:2024cv00604
Plaintiff:
David Kelley
Defendant:
Peter Boneparth, Wendy Arlin, Michael J. Bender and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Blevins v. Arora et al
as 5:2024cv02954
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Blevins
Defendant:
Nikesh Arora, Nir Zuk, Aparna Bawa and others
Vermeulen v. Bridgford Industries Incorporated et al
as 8:2024cv01055
Plaintiff:
Greg Vermeulen
Defendant:
Bridgford Industries Incorporated and Does 1 through 20, Inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Patrick Ayers et al v. Anthony Geisler et al
as 2:2024cv03937
Plaintiff:
Patrick Ayers
Petitioner:
Xponential Fitness, Inc.
Defendant:
Anthony Geisler, Jair Clarke, Mark Grabowski and others
FAGAN v. BARNHISER et al
as 2:2024cv06012
Plaintiff:
THOMAS J. FAGAN
Defendant:
BRET T. BARNHISER, NANOLOGIX, INC., DR. JONATHAN FARO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Bradford et al v. Anschuetz et al
as 3:2024cv02799
Plaintiff:
Galen Bradford and Gary Brown
Defendant:
Nathaniel Anschuetz, Jonathan Bram, Guthrie Dundas and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
