U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Cases filed
Cases 1 - 10 of 152,209
Hall v. Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, et al.
as 24-3100
Plaintiff: GWENDOLYN HALL
Defendant: WELLS FARGO BANK, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION, GO2BANK, U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION and others
Melchor Reyes v. Garland
as 24-3111
Petitioner: ARMANDO MISAEL MELCHOR REYES
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Murillo-Ramos v. Garland
as 24-3109
Petitioner: MIGUEL MURILLO-RAMOS
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Garcia Guillen v. Garland
as 24-3117
Petitioner: HENRY ADRIAN GARCIA GUILLEN
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dominguez v. Garland
as 24-3121
Petitioner: ROSA AMALIA DOMINGUEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Odquina v. City and County of Honolulu, et al.
as 24-3105
Plaintiff: EDWARD ODQUINA
Defendant: CITY AND COUNTY OF HONOLULU and ANNE E. LOPEZ, in her Official Capacity as the Attorney General of the State of Hawaii
Khatibi, et al. v. Hawkins, et al.
as 24-3108
Plaintiff: AZADEH KHATIBI, M.D., an individual, MARILYN SINGLETON, M.D., an individual and DO NO HARM, a Virginia nonprofit corporation
Defendant: RANDY HAWKINS, in his official capacity as President of the Medical Board of California, LAURIE ROSE LUBIANO, in her official capacity as Vice President of the Medical Board of California, REJI VARGHESE, in his official capacity as Executive Director of the Medical Board of California and others
Taylor v. Thornell, et al.
as 24-3114
Petitioner: CAMERON LEEZELL TAYLOR
Respondent: RYAN THORNELL, DIRECTOR OF THE ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, REHABILITATION, KRIS MAYES, Attorney General of the State of Arizona, DAVID SHINN, ADOC Director and others
Favor v. Minaj, et al.
as 24-3115
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: NIKKI MINAJ, MAXINE A. and BABY CASH MONEY RECORDS
Favor v. Harper
as 24-3116
Petitioner: BRANDON ALEXANDER FAVOR
Respondent: RAQUEL HARPER

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?