Sixth Circuit Labor Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,014
Bartol v. City of Chattanooga
as 1:2024cv00170
Plaintiff:
Robert Bartol
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993
Qin v. Unum Life Insurance Company of America et al
as 1:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Dujie Qin
Defendant:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America and Unum Group Corp.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Teamster Local 337 v. Heartland Steel Products
as 2:2024cv11300
Plaintiff:
Teamster Local 337
Defendant:
Heartland Steel Products
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Hobbs v. Howland Company LLC
as 4:2024cv00875
Plaintiff:
Jarrod Hobbs
Defendant:
Howland Company LLC
Langworthy v. New York Life Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv11291
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Langworthy
Defendant:
New York Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Krista Jones v. Interlake Steamship Company, et al
as 24-1435
Plaintiff:
KRISTA JONES
Defendant:
INTERLAKE STEAMSHIP COMPANY and MARINE ENGINEERS BENEFICIAL ASSOCIATION, DISTRICT 1 - PCD
Wagenschein v. CEDAR RIDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC
as 2:2024cv02449
Plaintiff:
Ethan Wagenschein
Defendant:
CEDAR RIDGE BEHAVIORAL HEALTH SOLUTIONS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 754 Discrimination
Smith v. Wellpath LLC et al
as 4:2024cv00050
Plaintiff:
Michael Shane Smith
Defendant:
Wellpath LLC, Karmen Penrose, Kannitha West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
VanAgtmael v. Hart, City of et al
as 1:2024cv00505
Plaintiff:
Scott A. Vanagtmael
Defendant:
Hart, City of and Rob Splane
Cause Of Action: 38 U.S.C. § 4301 Uniformed Services Employment and Reemployment Rights Act
Swain v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv00603
Plaintiff:
Steven Swain
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
