Tenth Circuit Prisoner Petitions Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 49,516
Pickens v. Harding
as 4:2024cv00235
Petitioner:
Darrin Lynn Pickens
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Jones v. Day et al
as 6:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Jones
Defendant:
Jeremy Day and Trisha Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Weaver (ID 112321) v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2024cv03073
Plaintiff:
Dalton Tyler Weaver
Defendant:
Kansas, State of, Kansas Department of Corrections, Shannon Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barrett v. New Mexico Parole Board
as 1:2024cv00480
Plaintiff:
Robert Barrett
Defendant:
New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez v. Redd et al
as 2:2024cv00349
Plaintiff:
Manuel Alex Hernandez
Defendant:
Brian Redd, Bart Mortensen, Randall Honey and others
Interested Party:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Valencia v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00476
Plaintiff:
Raul Angel Valencia
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sanchez v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00474
Plaintiff:
Dominic Sanchez
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Rios
as 2:2024cv00479
Petitioner:
John K Williams
Respondent:
Hector Rios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ellis v. Diggins, et al
as 24-1204
Plaintiff:
DAWAUNE ELLIS, II
Defendant:
ELIAS DIGGINS and DENVER HEALTH MEDICAL CENTER
Maldonado v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Frankie Maldonado
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
