Federal Cases, Dockets, and Filings From U.S. District Courts and U.S. Courts of Appeal
Cases 51 - 60
(PC) Jackson v. Pouge, et al.
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Cornel Jackson
Defendant:
Tyson Pouge, Esteves, Cpt. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meilstrup et al v. G2 GAMING, LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00585
Plaintiff:
Jay Meilstrup and Yvonne Meilstrup
Defendant:
G2 GAMING, LLC, GSGH HOLDCO, LP and Greg Carlin
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv01272
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Gwizdowski v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv01431
Plaintiff:
Jill M. Gwizdowski
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Interested Party:
Ssaogcomms SSA Notify
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Sainpaulin v. Pathstone Corporation et al
as 6:2024cv06309
Plaintiff:
Shahadah Sainpaulin
Defendant:
Pathstone Corporation, Liumor Portfolio and Alex Castro
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Portx, Inc. v. Port X Logistics, LLC
as 1:2024cv00475
Plaintiff:
Portx, Inc.
Defendant:
Port X Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Beutler III v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00472
Plaintiff:
Richard Joseph Beutler III
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Parkman, Thomas v. Columbia County Sheriff's Office et al
as 3:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Thomas M. Parkman, IV
Defendant:
Columbia County Sheriff's Office and Sergeant Haueter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Flores, Ramon v. Warden of FCI - Oxford
as 3:2024cv00330
Petitioner:
Ramon Flores
Respondent:
Warden of FCI - Oxford
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
